We are saddened by last week's tragic event, similar ones already forgotten and others which we never got to know about.
This is all the fault of political correctness, a system embraced by the most opportunists of politicians. Their way of handling this crisis has given teeming thousands the hope of a better life elsewhere. Their method is an accomplice to human trafficking and the ensuing business racket run by hidden hands and NGOs.
Unfortunately, this measure has instilled in thousands of Africans a sense of continuity, of hope as well as a fake assurance of life-saving missions.
Had politicians tackled the immigration problem sensibly, the fatal crossings would not have become popular. Instead, Europe embarked on a project to destroy Libya, ushering a new era of uncontrolled Libyan coasts where abuse is now rampant.
The Maltese people voted against these perilous journeys by choosing a party that promised pushbacks. This would have sent a message to each and every African city and village that it was not worth risking one's life. Sixty-nine 'do-gooders' had opposed the pushback and the Prime Minister succumbed to the pressure. Later on he stated that promised pushback was a mistake. The same Prime Minister had also said that Libya was the solution. He was wrong in this latter statement, for Libya has proved to be the problem instead. He also betrayed the people by promising something he had no power to accomplish. The hands of those who helped making boat-crossings popular are blood-stained.
Someone, 10 years ago, had asked authorities to stop crossings at 14 miles. He was ridiculed, vilified and accused as racist. This tyrannical response has become standard practice, a last refuge for each and every liberal. Had such an advice been heeded, we wouldn't have been mourning these poor souls. We would have been good neighbours.
As Europe wonders how to deal with the immigration crisis, other nations, such as China, speed up their contracts and secure the tapping of the vast African resources that normally ends up promoting inhumane working conditions. The deaths of those who do not make it to Europe are indeed a tiny fraction of the lives lost due to constant wars, promoted by those who have weapons to sell and interests to protect.
What about the men, women and children who cannot afford the journey and remain home?
Why is Europe investing in China when it can invest in Africa instead and improve their situation?
Adriano Spiteri