Maltese MEP Alfred Sant abstained on the final vote on the resolution which sets out the European Parliament's position on the negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union.

Dr Sant said the proposals on the dissolution of the UK membership from the EU may have the effect of increasing uncertainties, instead of minimizing them. A more effective approach would be to negotiate on a final position for the UK-EU relationship, and then move towards it in a phased manner, remarked the Maltese MEP when explaining why he was abstaining on this resolution.

“While in broad agreement with this resolution, I have abstained in the vote on it for the following reasons: I fail to see how in negotiating for an amicable divorce, it is proposed to first decide on the dissolution of the marriage, and then discuss the terms for the post divorce situation. This procedure is neither realistic nor coherent with objectives that the resolution itself sets. It may have the effect of increasing uncertainties, instead of minimizing them.

A more effective approach would be to negotiate on a final position for the UK-EU relationship, and then move towards it in a phased manner. I fail to understand the claim that this would weaken the hands of EU negotiators. Also, the time allowed to MEPs for reflection and discussion was too short. Internal discussions on the draft text were basically on a take it or leave it basis. Thirdly, a Parliament which rightly prides itself on insisting for full transparency in public affairs, has chosen as its representative in the Brexit negotiations, a member who derives income from sources outside Parliament but on matters related to its activities. I cannot accept this; huge scope could arise for potential conflicts of interest.” remarked the Maltese MEP.

The resolution was approved with 516 votes in favour, 133 against, with 50 abstentions.