The Malta Independent 19 April 2024, Friday
View E-Paper

Updated: DLH slams MDA proposal to 'reassign' floor area to further boost construction

Friday, 22 March 2019, 16:10 Last update: about 6 years ago

Din l-Art Helwa said today it is firmly opposed to the latest proposal by the Malta Developers Association, which, as reported in the media, effectively requests the Prime Minister to facilitate construction in locations, or on scales which are currently not permitted, with the claimed objective of protecting urban conservation areas.

At the MDA’s annual general meeting earlier this year, their president had complained that developers often face delays due to heritage concerns. The MDA seems to be now proposing that their members would stop trying to build multiple storeys in old village cores, by instead being given permission to increase construction in other parts of the island. This is in itself an indictment of the ineffectiveness of the authorities that are currently entrusted with protecting our village and town cores.

This proposal completely negates the basic concept of planning regulation. Planning laws and policies exist to safeguard the interests of the community, and developers cannot be allowed to trade rights and reassign floor space from an area to another. The protection of village cores cannot be ‘traded’ for the disregard of existing planning policies elsewere. 

Din l-Art Helwa asked the government to immediately and unequivocally reject this proposal by the MDA, and instead to strengthen the protection of both urban cores as well as rural areas outside the development zones.

 

MDA denies floor area ‘reassignment’ will be from urban cores and UCAs

In a statememnt, the MDA “categorically” denied that it has proposed to ‘reassign’ building volumes from urban cores and UCAs to further facilitate construction in other locations, as has been alleged by an eNGO.

“What the MDA has proposed is that in other urban areas, outside urban cores and UCAs.where the pre-2006 height relaxation extended to four floors and a penthouse, it is prepared to create a balance so that the heights of these formerly two-storey buildings will be retained and transferred to other areas where height limitation is not an issue.”

The MDA added that. “This is solely in the interest of the country to keep the identity of certain towns and villages. To suggest that the MDA wishes to any way tamper with urban cores, UCAs and rural areas outside development zones is totally incorrect.”

 

 

  • don't miss