Leo Brincat made a lot of common sense (Why Labour gives tourism such a high profile opinion, January 31) for an MP. And when he says hotels should make more use of direct Internet bookings he is, of course, right. The problem is that this system brings the tourist straight back to the issue of Air Malta pricing (which, incidentally, directly influences BA/GB fares).

It is by now well known (although it cannot be repeated too often) that a family of four in, say, Manchester, can book a fortnight’s holiday, including hotel and car hire, more cheaply in Florida than the cost of a flight-only ticket to Malta. And in Florida they will find sunshine, recognisable (and cheaper) food, the English language, friendly people and beaches.

Similarly, a Maltese family would spend far more on getting from here to London (1,128 nautical miles), than on flying on from Heathrow to Miami (3,856 nautical miles).

Cheaper flights, however they are achieved, are obviously the answer. It is not very helpful to find “special rates” quoted for fares that are effectively then doubled by taxes. The idea of a “fuel surcharge” is a total con. Fuel is the biggest element of the fare, and is generally the basis for the price. It is like a bus fare being quoted as 20 cents, and then the driver unexpectedly asking for more, as a “fuel surcharge”, because the cost of diesel has been increasing over the years.

But perhaps I shouldn’t put ideas into their heads...

Revel Barker

Ghajnsielem, Gozo