The Malta Labour Party was always intended to be a catalyst for change. The past few weeks have seen a continuation of a consultation process to identify the needs of our society. This is a strategy for change that has been the centre-point of the MLP strategy for some time now, and has gained new impetus following Joseph Muscat’s election. The MLP, consonant with its basic raison d’être, has taken upon itself the responsibility of asking the population at large for input on the changes that may affect their day-to-day existence in the long- or short-term. This is all part of an ongoing consultation process which can only bring about a more holistic approach to any problem.

This strategy has been exemplified by the position paper the MLP is preparing on rent reform and the proposals put forward by the government. We have read numerous opinions on this reform. There are views that are negative and others which are positive. Naturally, the MLP leadership and executive have their own views as well. However, the MLP has indicated that in keeping with its policy of consultation, prior to coming out with its own policy paper, it intends to consider the views of any contributors. Contributions are being asked from people from all walks of life since this reform will affect us all. There is no imposition here, unlike others who impose and then ask for opinions!

This then is the future of the MLP in the short and long term and is manifested in various other issues such as the university. The MLP has also embarked on a process of consultation with university students. The questions being put are simple: what do you, the student, think needs to be done in order to improve our university? This is a courageous step taken by the MLP. It is the students who see and feel the system at work, so asking for their subjective views can only lead to better long term possible solutions. By doing so the MLP is once again distancing itself from the imposition method so often used with regard to education in our country. The premise here is that when discussing the university we are talking about a student body of an age when opinions are freely given. This is positive. To have feedback only from student organisations is not enough since the organisations may have an agenda of their own too!

It is always counterproductive to believe in go-it-alone policies in today’s complex world. Too many problems facing our country are the result of decisions taken by the government without proper consultation, as witnessed in the Drydocks situation that seems to be facing an impasse. The MLP has indicated its desire to consult on all matters and this can only be described as deserving of merit. This is the sensible way forward.