Ten years after Parliament unanimously recognised Maltese Sign Language as a national language, Malta has every reason to look back with pride. That decision was more than a legal milestone. It was a statement about the kind of country we claim to be: inclusive, respectful and conscious that dignity is not something to be selectively granted, but something every citizen is entitled to.

For the deaf community in Malta and Gozo, the recognition of Maltese Sign Language affirmed that their language is not secondary, not lesser, and certainly not a mere support tool. It is a language in its own right, with its own structure, its own richness and its own cultural significance. In that sense, the anniversary is not simply a commemoration of a law passed a decade ago. It is a reminder that language is identity, and that recognition matters.

There has undoubtedly been progress. The establishment of the Maltese Sign Language Council, the introduction of interpreter training at the University of Malta, and the development of specialised services all show that the law was followed by practical measures. These are important achievements and should be acknowledged. The investment in a course taught in Maltese Sign Language is also a welcome sign that the country is trying to move beyond token gestures.

But anniversaries should not only be about celebration. They should also be moments of honest reflection. Ten years on, the question is simple: have we done enough to make Maltese Sign Language visible, accessible and normalised in everyday life?

The answer, if we are being honest, is no.

If Malta truly believes that Maltese Sign Language is one of its national languages, then it should be treated with the same seriousness and visibility that any national language deserves. That means it should not remain confined to ceremonies, official statements and specialist services. It should be present where society lives and breathes: in schools, on television, in public communication and in cultural life.

One of the clearest areas where improvement is needed is broadcasting. There should be more television programmes that include sign language interpretation, particularly news bulletins, public affairs programmes, major national announcements and important cultural events.

Access to information is not a privilege. It is a right. In moments of national importance, whether a public health update, a political debate or a major emergency, persons who are deaf or hard of hearing should not be left depending on delayed summaries or partial access. Sign language on television should be normal, not exceptional.

At the same time, Malta should seriously consider making Maltese Sign Language available as an option in schools. This would be a forward-looking and meaningful reform. Offering it as an optional subject would not only create greater awareness and understanding among hearing students, but would also help break down barriers from an early age. It would send a powerful message that inclusion is not about asking minorities to adapt to the majority, but about building a society where communication is shared and mutual.

Learning sign language should not be seen as something only relevant to the deaf community. It is relevant to all of us. It enriches communication, deepens empathy and strengthens the social fabric.

Ten years after its recognition, Maltese Sign Language must move from the margins to the mainstream.