In every modern democracy, voting is one of the fundamental rights of the citizen. It is the means by which each person can express their opinion freely, without pressure or fear. However, for this right to be truly respected, there is one essential principle that must never be compromised: the secrecy of the vote.
During election periods, we often speak about transparency, fairness, and participation. Yet there is one aspect that does not always receive the attention it deserves - the situation of those individuals who, for various reasons, require assistance in order to vote. These may include persons with disabilities, the elderly, or individuals who have difficulty reading and writing. For them, the voting process is not always as private and straightforward as it should be.
At present, the procedure provides that such individuals are assisted by assistant commissioners, usually in a closed environment. While this system was intended to help and ensure that everyone is able to vote, in practice it raises several serious concerns. In many cases, the voter is in a room with multiple officials, and others may be nearby. This creates a situation where the vote is not always kept secret. In fact, if the person speaks in a loud voice, there is even the possibility that others may overhear from outside.
This not only contradicts the principle of ballot secrecy, but may also cause the voter to feel uncomfortable or even intimidated. The dignity of the individual should always come first, especially in such an important moment as voting. Every citizen should have the same opportunity to vote freely and confidentially, without any form of direct or indirect pressure.
For this reason, there is a need for serious reflection on how this system can be improved. One proposal that could be considered is to allow individuals who require assistance to choose their own helper - a trusted person, such as a family member or close friend. This would be an important step toward greater respect for personal freedom and the voter's privacy.
Naturally, for such a system to function effectively and fairly, clear safeguards would be necessary. For example, a consent form could be introduced, to be signed by both the voter and the assisting person. This form could include a declaration that the assistant is acting according to the voter's wishes and is not influencing their decision. Additionally, clear guidelines could be established to prevent any form of abuse.
In several other countries, similar systems already exist that provide greater flexibility to voters who require assistance. This shows that there are practical ways to maintain both the integrity of the election and the dignity of the individual. Malta, too, has the opportunity to modernize its practices in this area and to serve as an example of inclusivity and respect for fundamental rights.
Moreover, such a change could help strengthen public trust in the electoral system. When people feel respected and protected, they are more likely to participate in the democratic process. Participation is not only a matter of numbers, but also of quality - how free and secure voters feel when making their choice.
It is also important to understand that this is not a political issue, but a matter of principle. It should not be subject to partisan debate, but rather to national agreement on what is best for the common good. Voting is a personal and sacred right, and it should be safeguarded by every possible means.
Ultimately, the question is simple: can we do better? If there is even the slightest possibility that any voter is not enjoying full secrecy, then we have a responsibility to address the situation. The progress of a society is also measured by how it treats its most vulnerable members.
This issue has been on my mind for a long time, and I believe now is the time for it to be seriously discussed. I hope that the relevant authorities will consider these proposals and work toward a system that truly respects the dignity, freedom, and secrecy of every voter.
Because in the end, a strong democracy begins with a free and secret vote - for everyone, without exception.
Ivan Bartolo MP