On 14 June, The Malta Independent on Sunday published an article I wrote under the headline "Electoral Success Does Not Silence Legitimate Questions." What I did not anticipate was the reaction it would generate on Facebook, where it attracted nearly 270 comments and more than 330 emoji reactions of various kinds.
A significant number of the comments were written in poor, often grammatically incorrect Maltese. More concerning, however, was their content. Rather than engaging with the arguments presented in the article, many commenters chose to launch personal attacks against the author.
The article itself contained neither invective nor bad taste. Its purpose was to raise legitimate questions and contribute constructively to public debate. Yet much of the response ignored the issues raised and focused instead on discrediting me personally. As a result, the discussion shifted away from the substance of the article and became an exercise in attacking the commentator rather than challenging the commentary.
Political trolls and keyboard warriors rarely contribute anything meaningful to public discourse. Genuine debate requires a willingness to engage with ideas rather than individuals. In a healthy democracy, people can disagree strongly while still respecting differing opinions and participating in thoughtful, civil discussion.
Everyone in a democratic society has the right to express their views freely. I fully intend to continue exercising that right, even when my opinions may be unwelcome or unpopular with some readers.
If committed supporters of any political party believe that insults, ridicule, and verbal attacks will persuade those who hold different views - or politically independent individuals - to support their cause, they are mistaken. People are far more likely to be convinced by reasoned arguments, respectful engagement, and constructive dialogue than by hostility and personal abuse.
From my experience as a former trade union leader, I know that earning the trust of those sitting across the negotiating table is often essential to achieving success. When discussions are approached with preparation, respect, and a clear plan, one is already well on the way towards reaching a positive outcome.
I am no stranger to criticism, including criticism that is unfair or crosses the line. However, such behaviour reflects primarily on those who engage in it and, to some extent, on the political movement they support. Far from enhancing the image of a political party, personal attacks diminish the quality of public discourse and undermine the credibility of those responsible for them.
For those unable to advance a reasoned argument, I would suggest that before rushing to the keyboard with empty comments, emojis, and reactions, they take a moment to reflect on what they are contributing to the discussion.
At this stage in my life, I offer this advice freely to anyone who may find it useful. Social media is a powerful tool when used responsibly and constructively. Unfortunately, too many people use it as a platform for attacking others rather than engaging in meaningful debate.
Those who genuinely believe that a one-party state would benefit Malta should reflect on where our country might be today had it failed to join the European Union - a development strongly opposed by the Labour Party at the time.
Regardless of how others choose to use social media, one thing I can say without hesitation is this: my principles and values are not for sale.
A final observation concerns the Maltese language itself. Mikiel Anton Vassalli was fascinated by its beauty and richness and regarded it as one of the defining symbols of our national identity. He compiled a Maltese grammar and dictionary that continue to be recognised today. Few people realise that every time we write in Maltese - even when composing a brief message - we are following principles that Vassalli championed more than two centuries ago.
This great scholar and intellectual would undoubtedly be dismayed if he could see some of what is written on social media today, particularly in Maltese.
Either our educational system is failing in its mission, or many of those who comment on Facebook possess only a limited grasp of Maltese grammar and spelling. Whichever is the case, it should concern us all and, indeed, be a source of national embarrassment.
Anyone choosing to express opinions publicly should make at least a basic effort to write correct Maltese. We often speak proudly of our small Mediterranean nation and its unique language. Yet if we cannot write that language properly, perhaps we should reflect more carefully on what that pride truly means.
Gejtu Vella is a People & Industrial Relations Consultant